Atheism vs the Creator: Omniscience

 Presumption of Omniscience. 

This is another logical flaw in the Atheistic worldview. When the atheist declares, 'There is no God', he is asserting that he knows all the mysteries in the universe, inhabits eternity, & has all knowledge. It is a statement of divine omniscience. But this is absurd. How can any human being claim to have all knowledge about everything, & categorically declare anything like this? The atheist is not just saying, 'I have no evidence of the supernatural', but is making a positive statement of belief.. that there IS NO GOD. He is claiming that nobody could ever have any interaction with the supernatural, but every anecdotal story about it is contrived, or imagined. All of these claims are made without any evidence.

Now, some atheists move easily between agnosticism & atheism, & wriggle out of the above fallacy by claiming ignorance. When challenged, he changes the tune, & revises the claim, 'I have no evidence of a god, therefore i do not believe in a god'. This is better, as a subjective statement of belief, but more often the claim is hiding the dogmatic disclaimer, 'And no one else has any evidence of a god, either!' They do not merely claim personal ignorance, but move back into the state of omniscience, where they can declare themselves to be the 'knower of all things'. Because of their own limited experience, or lack of understanding, they project that on everyone else, & declare EVERYONE'S knowledge or experience invalid, if it conflicts with their own. So whether the claim is made under atheism or the quick revision of agnosticism, the same pretense of omniscience is made.

IMO, this is why many atheists are so arrogant.. they truly believe themselves at the pinnacle of knowledge, & there is nothing more for them to learn. Everything is neatly defined, & dogmatically presented. Now, of course, many theists do this as well, which is another evidence that both beliefs are religious in nature. They both are zealously defended, promoted, & the opposite attacked. Either belief system seems to attract zealots & dogmatists for their cause.  That is why atheism is primarily a religious belief,  and is not a scientifically evidenced hypothesis. 

This is also why true science is not at odds with creationism.  Science is a method of discovery,  not a club to defend one's philosophical beliefs.  It is religious  bigotry and pseudoscience, that declares, 

'Atheistic Naturalism is science! Creationism is religion!'

..because IF.. there really is a Creator/God (and there absolutely is), THEN searching for the hows and whys of the universe we live in is a valid exercise, for the created beings of humanity.  Knowledge of the world around us has been the pursuit of countless creationists, for millennia.  It is NOT the exclusive domain of atheists

Atheism vs the Creator: Indoctrination

State Indoctrination

Atheistic Naturalism has become the Official State Religion. It is promoted in every national park, public media show, entertainment, schools, universities, & driven into impressionable children from infancy. Movies are filled with sci-fi imaginings of evolution. The media, entertainers, celebrities, govt leaders... everyone of influence & status present a unified, constant drumbeat of naturalistic origins. Even if it is blended with some nostalgic references to a deity, there is NEVER any question of the theories presented, the narrative, or the ideology. The Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Common Ancestry, the 3 pillars of atheistic naturalism, are exclusively taught, and zealously defended by the High Priests of Atheism.

Historical timeline

To show the progression of this belief system, & how it has become the official state religion, one only need to follow the court's rulings on common ancestry, aka, evolution. Since evolution is a foundational element for the belief in atheistic naturalism, & the cornerstone for atheism, it follows that it needs to have a voice, if the atheistic worldview is to gain traction. Creation was the majority belief system for origins, for most of American history (and world history). When Darwin's theory began to spread among the intelligentsia & the academic elite, a naturalistic view ..evolved.. that was much superior to the old one: spontaneous generation. Pasteur's experiments, and other scientific discoveries, were putting too many holes in the pop belief of the day for naturalism. But the Theory of evolution (ToE), had no such experimental flaws. It was a belief, shrouded in scientific jargon, that could not be falsified by  traditional scientific methodology. There were no proofs FOR the theory, but neither could it be disproved, as the assumed time frames made that impossible.

In 1925, during the early years of progressive ideology, the Scopes Monkey Trial, as it was called, brought the ToE to the limelight. Politicians & elite academians had been singing the praises of common ancestry for years, but most of the rank & file citizens did not. Engineers, doctors, & the applied sciences were concerned with practical science, not the theorizing & speculations of philosophical beliefs. This trial was from a lawsuit in Tennessee, where a state law had forbade the teaching of evolution. After much grandstanding by the lawyers, it was eventually held up by the court. The states were allowed to decide the curriculum on origins. The advent of WW2 put the promotion of evolution on the back burner.. especially since the 'godless commies', & the Nazis used evolution as an integral part of their ideology. Americans were in the midst of a mini religious awakening, & faith in God took center stage in this struggle against despotic aggression. 'Under God', was added to the pledge of allegiance in 1954. 'In God we Trust' was to be put on all money in 1956. 'Godless Commies' were pursued by McCarthy, in an effort to rid the nation of anti-American influences. Marxist ideology was very popular in the entertainment industry, the universities, & the intelligentsia, but they slunk in the shadows, unwilling to openly proclaim their beliefs.

But by the 1960s, this began to change. The Scopes ruling was overturned, & the ToE was allowed to be taught, alongside a supernatural view. In 1967, the state of Tennessee repealed the act that forbade the teaching of evolution. Slowly, a series of court cases have brought us to where we are today, where the ToE is the ONLY allowed belief system of origins. No criticism or questioning of the science is allowed, but mandated belief & conformity in what is presented as Absolute Truth, regarding origins. Most students now graduate from school well versed in the doctrines of evolution, & believe it to be 'settled science'. Ironically, it was not scientists that made this social change, but lawyers, imposing their indoctrinated beliefs on everyone else.

Since the ToE is the cornerstone of the naturalistic world view, & since every atheist i have ever known has professed a belief in this theory, it is not hard to correlate the expansion of atheism with the promotion & eventual monopoly of this belief system on origins.

Note this study on atheism in the US:

Atheists, in general, are more likely to be male and younger than the overall population; 68% are men, and the median age of atheist adults in the U.S. is 34 (compared with 46 for all U.S. adults). Atheists also are more likely to be white (78% are Caucasian vs. 66% for the general public) and highly educated: About four-in-ten atheists (43%) have a college degree, compared with 27% of the general public.

Self-identified atheists tend to be aligned with the Democratic Party and with political liberalism. About two-thirds of atheists (69%) identify as Democrats (or lean in that direction), and a majority (56%) call themselves political liberals(compared with just one-in-ten who say they are conservatives). Atheists overwhelmingly favor same-sex marriage (92%) and legal abortion (87%). source: 10 facts about atheists | Pew Research Center

The timeline & correlation of the subjects of indoctrination are impossible to miss. Atheists just happen to be mostly progressive, in their political views, & fall in line with most of the progressive talking points. Even the few that do not, mostly older atheists, have the same indoctrination about the ToE. They believe it to be Proven Scientific Fact, & allow no questioning or examination of the science behind it. They are triggered to irrational rage, if anyone dares question the sacred tenets of their beliefs. Outrage, not science, is the primary "argument' for the defenders of atheistic naturalism. When you add the progressive doctrines of global warming, sexual identity, abortion, social justice, & other neo marxist/darwinist agendas, the evidence of it being politically indoctrinated dogma is unmistakable.

Atheists are made, not born. They are the result of a series of indoctrinating processes, put together in unison by a manipulative philosophical belief system. Progressive ideology is at the root of this indoctrination, & it controls every institution in America. The few dissenting voices are shut down, attacked with jihadist zeal, & ridiculed with contempt.

But it is not enough to merely indoctrinate at a young age. They keep up the narrative with a constant barrage of religious programming. PBS uses tax dollars to fund a constant stream of indoctrination to prop up the beliefs inculcated since childhood. The entertainment industry produces movie after movie, tv show after tv show, dedicated to the naturalistic narrative. The heroes & protagonists in movies are almost always portrayed as naturalist/atheists, while the antagonists are usually portrayed as evil, bigoted, theists. This is all part of the unified indoctrination process for promoting the naturalistic world view, & the results are proof of the effectiveness of indoctrination. Many, if not all of the atheists i know spend a great amount of their free time watching PBS nature shows, where the reinforcement of their earlier indoctrination can continue. They do not seek alternate views, or question the science presented, but eagerly devour what can only be called propaganda from politically driven ideologues with a political agenda

The Death of Atheism

..but i thought that atheism was the fastest growing worldview?  Almost every nation indoctrinates atheistic naturalism as our origins, censors and bullies creationists, and spews out a constant propaganda stream in every State Run institution, and almost every institution of man.

Yet here i am, predicting the death of atheism? 

Yes. I'll provide an historical timeline.

Pre-enlightenment. Before 1700s-

Many religious beliefs dominated the human worldview, but atheism was seldom mentioned, and was considered an outlier belief. Many cultures even forbade atheism, as a legitimate philosophical belief. All of the major philosophers, wise men, gurus, and thinkers in each generation affirmed not only a God or gods, but attributed our origins to supernatural intervention, not atheistic naturalism. 

Enlightenment/Reformation era, 1700s to 1900s.

 Natural Law, inherent rights, and even human governance was seen as something granted by a Deity. Human equality, resistance to despots, and the American Experiment sprang from the Enlightenment values of Natural Law, human equality, and inherent, God given rights. Atheism was seldom mentioned,  by any of that era's philosophers, until the mid 1800s.

The Birth of modern Atheism. Mid 1800s to now.

Marx and Darwin. Marx was a militant atheist who hated Christianity, mostly, but also any religious belief that was not atheistic. He set the stage for religious intolerance by smearing religious belief as 'the opiate of the masses'. But the forced atheism of marxist countries did not usher in an era of peace, prosperity, equality and fraternity,  as they promised, but only despotic rule, and misery for all who were not empowered by the ruling elite. 

Darwin provided a plausible pseudoscience basis for an atheistic worldview, but the advances in scientific discovery have debunked every claim of common ancestry.

The Trinity of atheistic naturalism is the combination of naturalistic origins of the universe, life, and species.  They are summarized thusly:

The Big Bang

Abiogenesis 

Common Ancestry 

These form the basis for atheistic naturalism,  but none of them have any basis in observable science. They are religio/philosophical opinions, not observable scientific methodology. Only by constant propaganda by agenda driven institutions and the State, invested in atheistic naturalism,  AND bullying and censorship from these same institutions, has atheistic naturalism grown to where it is today..  still a minority opinion, but a very vocal and militant one.

Even in America,  where religious freedom is given lip service to, the militant atheists have hijacked almost every institution,  and mandated the indoctrination of atheistic naturalism as 'settled science!' The courts have banned any mention of the Creator,  and any suggestion that scientific data supports a creation model is smeared and banned as 'religious!' Entertainment,  the media, public radio/tv, national parks, academia, govt bureaucracy,  and EVERY institution of man has been hijacked by atheistic naturalism..  even religious denominations and institutions. 

So how does this juggernaut of atheistic ideology diminish?  What will happen to convince people that there is, indeed, a supernatural dimension? 

A False Messiah

..accompanied by signs and wonders.  I cannot predict the timeline for the revealing of this entity, only that it will happen. The decline of America and the growth of the State juggernaut of Indoctrination seems to indicate an unfolding of this era, where a powerful leader, claiming divine ability, and possessing persuasive and deceptive powers, will dominate the world stage, and put to rest any doubt for the supernatural. Atheism will die, as the belief and adoration for this leader brings giddy excitement and devotion for the appearance of spiritual reality that the new messiah brings.

Christianity will diminish greatly, as the Great Apostasy runs rampant among religious institutions. But atheism will die, as the newfound god of this world reveals himself to a world that has rejected it's Creator. 

It could be years.. decades.. centuries. But the man of lawlessness will be revealed, and cast his spell on a foolish people who refuse to acknowledge their Creator. 

The Source of this prediction can be found in the Bible, a collection of canonized books within Christianity. I can reference the passages that point to this, if there is interest.

Atheistic Naturalism

 This concept is denied and obscured, by the propagandists and manipulators of Progressivism. It is the belief that all origins happened by natural processes,  without the intervention of a Creator. 

I have described the 3 pillars of atheistic naturalism in other articles:

The Big Bang:  Origin of the universe 

Abiogenesis: Origin of life 

Common Ancestry: Origin of species 

These are the trifecta of atheistic naturalism,  which provides the basis for atheism,  Marxism,  and Progressivism.   Atheistic naturalism is NOT  atheism, as belief in a God or gods is allowed, just not a Creator. A belief in God is permitted, by the High Priests of atheistic naturalism.  Your God can be good, compassionate, pacing about, wringing His hands over the inequities of this world, but He cannot be the all powerful Creator of the universe. THAT.. happened naturally.

Most theists, and even Christians,  believe in the Indoctrination..  that all origins were by natural processes, without the supernatural intervention of any God or Creator. Atheistic naturalism is the Majority Opinion, promoted as 'settled science!' It is, if course, the foundational belief among atheists, marxists, and other ideologies that reject God, but it is not exclusive to them.

It may seem like a subtle difference,  but the implications are significant. 

• Christianity is based on a lie. God did NOT  create everything, as the Messiah and His apostles testified. The bible is an antiquated collection of superstitions, and is not to be taken literally. 
• Morality is relative. Brutal animal instincts 'evolved' to 'be nice!' Murder, theft, and jungle Law are the only real virtues, with origins of atheistic naturalism. If there is a God, He is fickle and changing.. there are no absolutes.
• The soul of man, as a being created in the image of God, is imaginary.  Man evolved from 'lower' animals, and is not specisl or significant. He is no more than an amoeba or a fish.  There is no soul, heaven, or hell.  Imagine that.
• Natural Law, posited by the Enlightenment philosophers, (which is the foundation for the American Experiment), is a lie. Morality and human rights are man made constructs, to control people. 
• Human Equality is a lie. There are those more highly evolved,  and they should rule over their inferior subjects. 
• God is superfluous. People can believe,  if they wish, but it is irrational,  unscientific, and superstitious. It is an opiate for the masses, to keep them in subservience. 

All of these conclusions and implications from atheistic naturalism are diametrically opposed to the historical, biblical worldview. It is the root of Progressivism,  that is destroying America,  and replacing her with an Oligarchy.. a coalition of billionaires,  bankers, politicians, foreign powers, and self serving politicians, willing to sell out the American people for a Place of power and wealth. This process has been going on for decades, and the Indoctrination of the citizens is nearly complete. Atheistic naturalism is the Official State Religion.. it provides the foundation for all the tenets of Progressivism,  and has permeated all our institutions, ESPECIALLY  the 'religious' ones.

The denial and obfuscation of this naturalistic religious  belief is part of the pretense of 'science!', that these ideologues hide behind.  It is progressive pseudoscience pretension, and dominates the govt, academia,  entertainment, the judicial system, religious institutions, and every institution of man. ANY belief or expression for the Creator is ridiculed, reviled, and removed. Progressive courts and academic institutions have banned any mention of the Creator as 'religion!!', while the RELIGIOUS BELIEF  of atheistic naturalism is mandated as 'settled science!'

There are fewer and fewer voices, exposing this diabolical conspiracy, to establish a State mandated religious belief.  The few that are have been censored with increasing frequency and hostility. Reasoned discourse, or scientific debate is not allowed, as the bully pulpit of atheistic naturalism controls all the information outlets, and the Narratives. 

This is a warning to Christians: Beware the pseudoscience of atheistic naturalism!  Your Saviour IS the Creator,  as the scriptures have said. Science does not support atheistic naturalism,  as they decree..  they only censor any opposition to the State mandated beliefs. 

This is also a warning to non-Christians. You have been indoctrinated with pseudoscience pretension. The evidence in this world overwhelmingly suggests a Creator,  NOT atheistic naturalism. The Powers that be just will not let you see it. Reason and evidence are censored,  even in presumably sympathetic venues. The cancel culture will not only ban Mr. Potato Head, and Dr Seuss,  but any consideration of the Creator. 

Why do they ban any consideration of the Creator, in every progressive institution?  Because the Reality of the Creator takes their power..  they want people to worship and submit to them, as privileged elites, not some pesky God. He is the competition, and must be canceled. 

Pillars of Atheistic Naturalism: The Big Bang! !

 There are 2 possibilities, for the origins of life and the universe:

Intelligent Design

Atheistic Naturalism

To which i have assigned the more colorful descriptors:

Goddidit!

Nuthindidit!

So, what are the 3 pillars of atheistic naturalism?

The Big Bang 

Abiogenesis 

Common Ancestry 

I offer a peer review, of the scientific evidence and assumptions made in these 3 pillars of faith, in the ideological worldview of atheistic naturalism.

Let us examine the science behind the assumptions made in these theories.

The Big Bang

According to this theory, all matter and energy were somehow compressed into a 'particle', then exploded instantaneously to fill the visible universe. It is alleged that this is a cyclical process, that has been going on for eternity. It also has the same look and feel of a creation event, where an Almighty Creator spoke and formed the universe ex nihilo.

In order to come together, all matter would have to overcome the inertia from the previous bang, and somehow compress into a particle. Can this be observed? Can we repeat, even at a smaller scale, the processes behind this assumption?

No. This is a fantastic leap of faith, with no scientific validity.

Has this 'expansion' ever been observed, repeated, or tested in any way? No. It is a wildly imaginative theory, with no empirical basis.

Entropy is also contrary to this theory. Entropy is a repeatable, observable scientific principle that drives everything to randomness and chaos, not order and complexity. There is no mechanism or process that can overcome entropy, to compress, organize, or arrange all matter and energy into a particle, or any imaginative form. Dissipation and chaos, is all the universe offers. Even if you posit an initial 'big bang!', inertia, energy dissipating throughout infinite space, and decaying orbits would have left the universe dark, dead, and cold, eons ago.

This is just one pillar, that holds up the unsteady belief in atheistic naturalism. I will examine the other 2 in subsequent articles, for the entertainment and amusement of the reader.

These 3 pillars are the Trinity of atheistic orthodoxy. They are the legs of a stool, that supports the full weight of atheistic ideology. If even one fails, the basis for atheistic naturalism collapses. All 3 have no scientific basis, nor repeatable, observable science behind them, but are leaps of faith. It is only by constant propaganda and Indoctrination, from progressive institutions, that the belief in atheistic naturalism has grown, and has become so pervasive among the world's religious beliefs.

Pillars of Atheistic Naturalism: Abiogenesis

 Abiogenesis is another of the trifecta.. the Trinity of beliefs that provide the basis for atheistic naturalism.

In a previous article, i examined the 'Big Bang', as the First Cause of the origins of the universe. This article is about the First Cause of life. ..the origin of life.

Abiogenesis is the belief that life can spontaneously form, under the right conditions. A primordial soup of ingredients, mixed together in just the right way, then nudged by some spectral wave, heat, light, or other catalyst will, the belief says, result in primal life.

Unfortunately, man has not been able to animate life, in myriads of experiments over thousands of years, even with our ability to split the atom, and splice genes in the laboratory, the origins of life remain a cosmic mystery. NOTHING resembling 'life', has ever been 'created' by man. We have produced a few proteins, under rigorous laboratory conditions, but not even a one celled organism.. nothing like self replicating life.

If life were a simple scientific phenomenon, we could use scientific methodology to break it down, repeat the factors necessary to create it, and unravel the mystery of life. But alas! Life is not explainable by science. It is here. It teems on the earth, but nowhere else, to our knowledge. We think it a common, ordinary thing, and it is, but its origins are unfathomable to the rational mind.

If life could easily be created, by natural processes, one could believe in atheistic naturalism as a possibility for our origins. But life CANNOT be explained by atheistic naturalism. Only an Intelligent Power, able to create life, matter, space, and the entire universe, could have Authored Life. It is impossible for life to appear in a godless universe. There is no mechanism or scientific principle to generate it. Without the Creator, life is impossible.

Abiogenesis is an unscientific belief. It has no evidence of possibility, and EVERY experiment attempted by man has failed to produce life.

Yet atheistic abiogenesis is taught.. no, INDOCTRINATED, into gullible youth from infancy. It is DECLARED, with no evidence at all, that life began spontaneously, in some distant primordial ooze, and we 'evolved!' to what we are today. This fantastic religious belief has no basis in fact or scientific methodology, yet it is mandated as a belief. It is the Official State Religion.

This pillar of atheistic naturalism, that provides the ideological basis for Marxism, communism, and Progressivism, is contrary to the American principles of a Creator, endowing man with unalienable rights, and equality. It is at the root of the destruction of America. It is not a benign religious opinion.

The existence of life is compelling evidence FOR the Creator. It cannot be explained by atheistic naturalism.

The Big Bang

Abiogenesis

Common Ancestry

..these are the 3 pillars of atheistic naturalism. But they are unscientific hoaxes, to divide people from their Maker. Don't be a dupe to progressive propaganda. Science and Reason are useful tools of discovery. Use them.

The Pathway to Oligarchy

1. Declare the currency. Destroy hard assets, and make fiat acceptable.

2. Use monopoly to destroy the competition. Eliminate small businesses. ..under pretense of 'Public Safety!', if necessary.

3. Manipulate the markets and the currencies, like Soros, Gates, Bezos, and a growing cadre of financial sector puppet masters.
4. Create bubbles, to crash the housing markets and other sectors, to move wealth from the middle class to the oligarchs.
5. Pretend there is a distinction, or 'checks and balances!', between billionaire tech moguls, govt, wall street, the press, media, academia, and banks. Create an unholy alliance to 'buy' the Experiment in self rule, with these elements in complicity.
6. Distract, divide, delude, and dilute the citizens with open borders, 'racism!', lies and empty promises.
7. Construct a massive propaganda machine, employing useful idiots, like slebs, journalists, and runway models to instruct us in economics, science, and morality.
8. Infiltrate the courts, law enforcement (from the top down), and prosecutors to ignore real crime, while converting it to a tool of oppression against the citizens. Destroy and defund any real Law and Order.
9. Promote drug dependency, and addled perception. Keep the citizens in a drugged stupor, and subservient.
10. Overload our infrastructure with cloward/piven strategies, corruption, and runaway spending.
11. Transfer wealth from the producers: manufacturers, farmers, builders, etc, to money shufflers.
12. Indoctrinate atheistic naturalism as our 'Source'. Censor, mock, and ridicule any concept of the Creator. Lay the foundation for elitism, govt worship, rights as govt granted privileges, and subservience.
13. Fan flames of hysteria and outrage, creating bogeymen to instill fear and division.
14. Control the information. Censor any opposition. Create narratives and propaganda memes.

These are not new strategies, but they have been used successfully by progressives to destroy America. We can bitch and moan about it, but that won't change things. Patriotic Americans are a fading minority, and 3rd world dependency and subservience are the 'New! Improved!' American Standard. It has been a slow erosion of the principles of America, going back to the late 1800s. There was a brief pause, during the Big War, but revived with renewed passion in the 60s, and growing unrestrained until now.

We don't have to wonder what will happen. It has already happened.

Evidence for the Creator: Human Consensus

 Truth is not a democratic process. Truth is true, whether we believe it, know it, understand it, or not.

In the sphere of the human experience, a belief in a spiritual, metaphysical realm is a constant, across lines of time, region, culture, race, and religion. There may be different perceptions, as described by the old Hindu tale, 'The Blind Men and the Elephant,' but the reality of the Elephant is not in question.

For all of human history, there are too many instances of interaction with a spiritual dimension to dismiss. People from every time and region have testified to an encounter with 'something,' whether they defined it dogmatically or not.

I have no statistics, but i observe, that even in communist countries, where atheism was/is the mandated worldview, where theists are subjected to re-education and persecution, belief in a Supreme Being was/is still prevalent. Even now, after DECADES of mandated belief in atheistic naturalism, people in communist countries are embracing God, as the Source of all things. They seem to 'feel it', in their innermost being. Every major culture has acknowledged some kind of Divine, Spiritual Entity, or dimension, with a soul that lives on after death, morality, and sometimes accountability for 'bad' actions.

The more successful cultures have clearly defined Deity(s), with moral standards, and acknowledged Him/Them in their daily lives. The only historical atheistic cultures i know of were the communist ones in the recent era, and they were short lived. It seems that indoctrinating people to believe in random chance and godlessness isn't as effective as indoctrinating them into a Deity based worldview.

That will spell the end for the current progressive Indoctrination, too.. imo. But like other collectivist fantasies and utopias, previous failures won't deter them.. 'We'll get it right, this time!' 

So, along with the consensus of humanity as 'evidence' of a Supreme Being, i submit the efficacy and success of societies that acknowledge the Creator as evidence FOR a Creator.

This is a scientific and logical analysis of the phenomenon of human consensus. It is one evidence of many, of a Creation Event, and conflicts with the model of atheistic naturalism.

Evidence for the Creator: Conscience

 Definition of conscience:

Dictionary.com: the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action.

Merriam's: the sense or consciousness of the moral goodness or blameworthiness of one's own conduct, intentions, or character together with a feeling of obligation to do right or be good.

Cambridge: the part of you that judges how moral your own actions are and makes you feel guilty about bad things that you have done or things you feel responsible for.

The conscience can ONLY be real, if it was embedded by the Creator, or some Entity with the ability to instill moral imperatives within the psyche of man.

In a godless universe, the conscience can only be a man made construct.. platitudes to control people, with arbitrary rules that manipulators convince people have been instilled by a mythical God.

Perhaps you have heard some atheists boast, 'I don't need some God to scare me into doing right. I have a keen sense of right and wrong, and follow my conscience, not the commandments of God.'

But HOW can there even be a conscience, in a godless universe? There can be no moral absolutes, nor any standard of good and evil.

You do what you think best, and i do what i want. Your opinions about what is 'good' is no better or worse than mine. Hitler is no better or worse, in a godless universe, than Mother Theresa, or someone who dedicates themselves to help people, altruistically.

'I don't like murder, or racism, but i like chocolate!'

'I think eliminating inferior, or useless members of society is good, and i like artichokes!'

Moral imperatives, in a godless universe, are just arbitrary choices, in a vast smorgasbord of amoral platitudes.

People live. People die. The universe is a cosmic accident, with no 'higher' purpose, and no moral imperatives. That is the only conclusion, IF.. this is a godless universe.

But do we observe this, in the human experience?

No.

We observe human beings, of every imaginable philosophical beliefs, following the dictates of CONSCIENCE. Humans, as a whole, follow their moral compass, and try to keep a clear conscience. Even those who don't are viewed as 'evil!', 'sociopaths!', and aberrations in humanity, that should be incarcerated or eliminated from society.

It is irrational, and implausible, to believe that the conscience is a man made construct, indoctrinated by familial, social, or cultural platitudes. It is too universal and homogeneous, in the human experience, to posit that this inner sense was just 'suggested' by human manipulators, to control people.

THEREFORE, the conscience.. this universal sense of absolute right and wrong, could have only come by a Creator, Who embedded it in man as a moral compass, to guide his thoughts and actions.

This is clear evidence for the Creator. Many other such evidences exist, that compel a logical, scientific conclusion for the existence of a Creator, as the source and Cause, for our existence.

Evidence for the Creator: Entropy

 The law that entropy increases—the Second Law of Thermodynamics—holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature. — Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington

'Entropy' broadly means tending towards chaos constantly. ~Sid Sriram

The most obvious, proven, repeatable scientific principle is that of entropy. EVERYTHING in the universe increases in randomness and chaos, not order and complexity. Another force must act upon matter to put it in order. It does not happen by chance.

Entropy is simply the observable reality that all things tend towards randomness, unless acted upon by an intelligent, ordered force. Even things put into ordered complexity will decay into random disorder, if not maintained by an orderly force.

The origin of the universe had to have an ordered, intelligent force to begin. In a godless universe, all matter, order, and complexity we see now would have dissipated into random equilibrium.. cold, dead, lifeless matter, expanding eternally through infinite space and darkness. All stars would have burnt out eons ago, and planets, systems, and galaxies would be drifting endlessly.. no order.. no life.. only random chaos dissipating any semblance of order. There is NOTHING to 'arrange' the universe into galactic order, in a godless universe.

Life would be impossible, in a godless universe of eternal entropy. The complexity of living things, the blueprint of their design, and the visible order of the universe providing an island of ecosystem, in a harsh, lifeless universe, flies in the face of every natural law, which would have left everything cold, dark, and dissipated. The stars, orbits, galaxies, and EVERYTHING orderly in the universe cannot be explained by natural processes. What, (or more precisely, Who), overcame the universal, dissipating force of entropy, and ordered this universe into a small dot of livable possibility? The amazing complexity of life becomes absudly impossible, without an Intelligent Designer to order these things.

The Creation model explains entropy, cosmology, and the beginnings of life very well, and is congruent with the facts. Atheistic naturalism has no mechanism to overcome entropy, to either create life (abiogenesis), increase complexity (universal common ancestry), or cosmic origins (big bang). The obvious HUGE problem of Entropy, as a dissipating force in the universe, is ignored, for some magical, wishful thinking process, that is not defined, observed, or subject to scientific inquiry.

..neither atoms, nor compounds, nor chemical reactions are immune from the effects of entropy. Entropy rules, in our universe, with an iron fist. Nobody and nothing can escape its reach, and the simple fact of universal entropy makes the big bang, abiogenesis, and common ancestry impossible. There is nothing and nobody, in a godless universe, to 'create' order from randomness and chaos. There is nothing and nobody to 'create' life, and the amazing complexity and diversity we observe. ONLY an Intelligent Designer, with Extra-Natural Ability, could have ordered the universe, winding down, as it is, under the inescapable effects of Entropy.

"..if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation." — Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington